Promoting sociology in Australia
Facilitating sociology teaching and research
Enhancing the professional development of TASA members
50 Years of Social Inquiry, Engagement and Impact
TASA Public Lectures are designed as significant public events that aim to foster a positive public perception of sociology as a profession and to create links between sociologists and the broader community. They aim to showcase sociological scholarship, provide a forum for communication between TASA members, and they are also an important opportunity to promote sociology in your community.
Join one of Australia’s leading sociologists and experts in infection management and health services research to explore the threat of antibiotic resistance to Australia.
According to most predictions, including that of the World Health Organization, if we continue our current antibiotic use we are just decades from entering a post-antibiotic era. With superbugs proliferating and antibiotic options running out, we are about the face an ‘antibiotic perfect storm’. Infections previously easily treatable will become major threats to the Australian population. With few antibiotics being developed, and none that are able to treat many of the highly resistant organisms that are developing, the most viable solution identified by experts is the careful and judicious use of antibiotics. Yet, in Australia, like other countries, antibiotics continue to be used like there is no tomorrow. This TASA Public Lecture, given by A/Professor Alex Broom will outline the threat of antibiotic resistance to Australia, the reasons why antibiotics continue to be misused, and discuss potential solutions for protecting antibiotics for future generations. A/Professor Broom will focus on the importance of a cultural change around antibiotics – a process that must be driven by patients, communities and health professionals. Read on…
The Australian Cultural Sociology Thematic Group in Association with Thesis Eleven Drawing on his new book The Space of Opinion, Ronald Jacobs discusses the differ-ences between newspaper and television narratives about the economic crisis. Jacobs shows how newspaper commentaries focused on economic corruption and the need for financial regulation, while television overwhelmingly focused on political corruption, align-ing closely with the party positions of the political field. In general, cases of economic cri-sis offer strong evidence for the important role that newspapers play for improving the quality of mediated deliberation, at least compared to television. They also show why the presence of academic voices improves the quality of mediated public debate. June 13th, 2011 Full details here
The podcast is now available.
Hosted by: the Department of Sociology & Social Policy and the Biopolitics of Science Research Network, University of Sydney
Venue: Law School Foyer, Sydney University, 6 - 7.30 pm, 15 November.
Presenter: Professor Nikolas Rose
Presenter biography (brief):
Nikolas Rose is the James Martin White Professor of Sociology, Convenor of the Department of Sociology and Director of the BIOS Centre for the Study of Bioscience, Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Society at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He has published widely across: the sociology of psychiatry; the social and political history of the human sciences; the genealogy of subjectivity; the history of empirical thought in sociology, and on the changing rationalities and techniques of political power. His extensive body of work has been translated into ten languages. He is co-editor of BioSocieties: an interdisciplinary journal for social studies of neuroscience, genomics and the life sciences.
Abstract Are developments in the neurosciences transforming our conceptions of what it is to be a human being, and if so, how, in what ways, and with what consequences? And with what implications for the social and human sciences? It is far too early to reach any definitive diagnosis: investigations into the brain and nervous system can be traced back many centuries, but neuroscience is barely fifty years old. We need to be wary of suggestions that we are in the midst of epochal transformations. Yet it is hard to ignore the pervasiveness of references to the brain and neuroscience in our own times, the growth of research and scientific publishing, the scale of public and private investment in this research, the frequency of popular accounts of new discoveries about the brain in the mass media and in books written for a mass market. In this lecture, I argue that a number of mutations – conceptual, technological, economic and biopolitical - have enabled the neurosciences to leave the enclosed space of the laboratory and gain traction in the world outside. In the course of these mutations, the human brain has come to be anatomised at a molecular level, understood as plastic, and mutable across the life-course, exquisitely adapted to human interaction and sociality, and open to investigation at both molecular and systemic scales in a range of novel experimental setups. This has generated a sense of human neurobiology as not merely setting the conditions for the lives of human beings in societies, but also as shaping those social lives in all manner of ways that are not amenable to consciousness. Yet this is not ‘neuroreductionism’, and persons are not understood as determined by their neurobiology, or reduced to mere puppets of their brains. I will give some examples of the ways in which neurobiological knowledges are becoming technological, and reshaping some of the ways in which we are governed by others, and govern ourselves in practices from child rearing to the criminal justice system. It is right to be sceptical of the excitable claims of the popularisers of neuroscience, and the naïve enthusiasm of those who see this new knowledge of the brain as providing solutions to socio-political and cultural ills from lack of social mobility to crime control. Yet a recognition of this neurobiological transformation of our sense of what it is to be human should not be feared, for it opens many pathways for the productive transformation of the human sciences themselves.
The 2010 Public Lecture was co-hosted by ANU Sociology and the TASA Environment and Society Thematic Group, and addressed “How do we manage terrestrial animals and aquatic biodiversity on private land?” Unlike previous Public Lectures, there were 3 speakers, and only one of them was a sociologist. They included Ms Deb Kerr (from the National Farmers’ Federation), Professor Stephen Dovers (Director of the Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU) and Professor Stewart Lockie (Sociology, ANU). The speakers highlighted the critical importance of biodiversity, which has been overshadowed by climate change in recent years. There was a full lecture theatre, and a lively question and answer session afterwards. Highlights from the lecture can be found in Nexus 22:3
Hosted by the University of Sydney
Date: Tuesday 30 September 2008
Time: 5.30 – 7.00 pm (Refreshments after lecture)
Venue: The University of Sydney, Refectory, The Holme Building (A09)
RSVP: email@example.com by Monday, 22nd September.
Directions: http://db.auth.usyd.edu.au/directories/map/largemap00a.html - (Holme Building - Map Ref 14D – near Parramatta Rd Footbridge)
In reaction to the Burmese government’s resistance to allow humanitarian aid and agencies to provide relief to the mass victims of cyclone Nargis PM Kevin Rudd declared we should ‘bash the doors down diplomatically’ to persuade the Burmese regime to let us fulfill our humanitarian obligations towards innocent Burmese victims. The PM expressed a widespread revulsion at the Burmese government's rejection of humanitarian help, the rejection of a life preserving gift.
In this lecture Michael Humphrey explores the limits of the contemporary global politics of victims and therapeutic intervention and looks at the relationship between events of suffering, victims and political legitimacy.
Michael Humphrey is Chair of the Department of Sociology and Social Policy at the University of Sydney. He has published widely on the themes of the Islam in the West, the anthropology of globalisation, political violence and terrorism, human rights and reconciliation. A major theme is his work has been the relationship between the individual, collectivities and the state. His current research is on contemporary human rights politics and democratisation in Argentina and South Africa and globalised Islam and transnational governmentality.
A formal invitation was created for the 2008 Public Lecture.
Growing old disgracefully? Popular music and the ageing fan
Hosted by Griffith University (Centre for Public Culture and Ideas),
the lecture is being held in
Ship Inn Function Room, Griffith University QCA Campus, South Bank (click for map)
on Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 5.00pm-6.30pm.
TASA members are invited to join colleagues from the Griffith University and the TASA Executive for refreshments at:
6.30 - 7.30pm, Ship Inn Function Room, Griffith University QCA Campus, South Bank
The sociological study of popular music is now an established sub-discipline of the field. Significantly, however, in charting the cultural significance of popular music much sociological work continues to prioritise youth. In this public lecture, Andy Bennett draws on his recent ethnographic work with hippies, punks and dance music fans now in their forties and fifties as a means of both readdressing the dominant focus on youth and exploding popular stereotypes of ageing music fans as being driven primarily by nostalgia.
Utilising cultural sociological perspectives framed around issues of lifestyle, fragmented culture and reflexive modernity, Bennett examines how long term personal investment in a particular music style has influenced ageing fans’ lifestyles and shaped their biographies in relation to issues such as body image, employment, peer and family relations, and political and / or spiritual outlook. Bennett will then go on to consider the implications of his research findings for broader debates centring around issues of ageing and cultural participation in the context of late modernity.
Andy Bennett is Professor of Cultural Sociology at Griffith University and Deputy Director of the University’s Centre for Public Culture and Ideas. He is author of Popular Music and Youth Culture: Music, Identity and Place (2000), Cultures of Popular Music (2001), Culture and Everyday Life (2005) and Growing Old Disgracefully? Popular Music Fandom and Ageing (forthcoming). He is a Faculty Associate of the Center for Cultural Sociology at Yale University, an Associate of PopuLUs, the Centre for the Study of the World’s Popular Musics at Leeds University, and a member of the Board for the European Sociological Association Network for the Sociology of the Arts. He serves on the Editorial Boards of the journals Cultural Sociology, Leisure Studies, Perfect Beat and Music and Arts in Action .
RSVP September 17 to firstname.lastname@example.org or phone Jill Jones on 07 3735 7338.
The 2007 TASA AGM will be held in The Ship Inn Function Room , Griffith University QCA Campus, South Bank, Brisbane from 3.00pm-4.30pm Tuesday 25 September. More information is available for members click here.
There has been a change to the venue and time for The Australian Sociological Association public lecture and AGM.
The AGM will be at 3.30pm-5.00pm in the State Library of South Australia (same venue as previously).
The Public Lecture has moved to a larger venue and will now be held at:
5.30pm - 7.00pm, Radford Auditorium, Art Gallery of South Australia
Professor Anthony Elliott
Extreme Reinvention: the Rise of Makeover Culture
TASA members are invited to join colleagues from the Flinders Sociology Department and the TASA Executive for refreshments at:
7.00pm - 8.00pm, Restaurant, Art Gallery of South Australia
Please email email@example.com or ring Gillian Keightley on 08 8201 2026 to confirm your attendance (or RSVP)
at the Public Lecture (and refreshments) with this revised time and venue.
Hosted by the Flinders University Sociology Department,
the lecture is being held in
Radford Auditorium, Art Gallery of South Australia
On Tuesday September 26, 2006 at 5.30pm - 7.00pm
In this provocative public lecture on the social consequences of makeover culture, Anthony Elliott investigates what drives people to demand instant self-reinvention - from plastic surgery to online therapy, from compulsive consumerism to the self-help movement. He argues that we are witnessing the emergence of a "new individualism", and outlines a novel sociological perspective on people's emotional experiences of globalization.
The lecture will focus on the debate over globalization, with particular stress on the consequences of global transformations for the self and identity. Contesting mainstream explanations that view today's craze for reinvention as a result of the cult of celebrity, Elliott argues that an "ambient fear of globalism" haunts the new individualisms surfacing in the polished, expensive cities of the West. Surviving the new individualism, he suggests, is central to the tasks of a public sociology.
Anthony Elliott is Professor of Sociology at Flinders University . He was formerly Chair of Sociology at the University of Kent at Canterbury , UK . Professor Elliott's writings have been translated in ten languages, and his recent books include Critical Visions: New Directions in Social Theory (2003), Social Theory Since Freud (2004), Subject to Ourselves (2nd Edition, 2004) and, with Charles Lemert, The New Individualism: The Emotional Costs of Globalization (2005).
RSVP to firstname.lastname@example.org OR Gillian Keightley on 08 8201 2026
The 2006 TASA AGM will be held in the The Institute Building , State Library of SA, Adelaide from 3.30pm-5.00pm Tuesday 26 September. More information is available for members click here.
For a summary page of the day's events, please click here
The 2005 TASA public lecture will be presented by Professor Michael Gilding, Sociology, Swinburne University.
Biotechnology, Public Policy and Public Opinion
Monday, 26th September 2005
The University of Melbourne
Public Policy Theatre
234 Queensberry Street