Promoting sociology in Australia
Facilitating sociology teaching and research
Enhancing the professional development of TASA members

 
RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP JOIN TASA
 

About Sociology

Sociology has become a central component of multi-disciplinary teaching, learning and research.

Threshold Learning Outcomes for Sociology

TASA, as the peak body for Sociology in Australia, has been tasked with developing Threshold Learning Outcomes (TLOs), or minimum standards, for graduates of Australian undergraduate Sociology degrees. The TLOs are presented in this consultation document. We would appreciate feedback from interested parties by May 31, 2012.  Collected feedback will be added below. If you do not wish for your feedback to be published on this page, please state this in your response. You can provide feedback using the online form below, by email or by post to:

The Australian Sociological Association
Swinburne Institute for Social Research
Swinburne University
PO Box 218, Mailbag H98
Hawthorn, VIC, 3122.

Online Feedback Form

Your name:
Your email address:
Threshold Learning Outcome - Proposal Feedback:

Feedback

      1. Could TLO 2 under 'Knowledge and Understanding' add the words 'diverse and contested' before history? This might go some way toward indicating that, contra the way that it is often taught, 'Sociological history' does not simply consist of a lineage from Marx, to Weber, to Durkheim and beyond (to Bourdieu, Beck etc.)?
      2. Feedback from Alan Scott, Convenor of the Applied Sociology Thematic Group
      3. The Discipline of Sociology and Criminology at the University of New England discussed the Draft Learning Outcomes for Sociology Consultation Paper at its retreat day on 9 February 2012. The collective response was very positive: the proposed learning outcomes are broad enough to cover many different approaches to sociology and specific enough to make it easier for sociologists to “tell their story” to prospective students, to outside bodies, and to internal university administrative instances. There was, however, a suggestion that some consideration be given to incorporating a mention of the comparative elements in sociology. This might be done by, for example, altering TLO 1 to read:

“Demonstrate a sociological understanding from local, national and global perspectives of the nature of social relationships and institutions; the patterns of social diversity and inequality; and the processes that underpin social change and stability” .

There may, of course, be other ways of incorporating this idea.
We congratulate the TASA Sociology Discipline Reference Group on its excellent work.
Peter Corrigan (on behalf of the Discipline at UNE)